From: Matt Seitz (matseitz) <matseitz@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:36:29 GMT
Subject: RE: Question about submodules and absolute paths
Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C71F@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOmKuSqRHMS+hvCXL4Ok6ReTPW-3xT9SunGeibjCCCgVk9SU6Q@mail.gmail.com>

> From: Alexey Pelykh [mailto:alexey.pelykh@gmail.com]
> 
> Indeed this is a workaround, what I was thinking about to use. The
thing I
> wanted actually to discuss whether it worth to research possibility of
> replacing these absolute paths with relative ones. 

Sure.  I just wanted to offer an immediate, interim solution until there
is a decision on the permanent solution.