From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:14:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t2080: fix cp invocation to copy symlinks instead of following them
Message-ID: <6b868297-0e1d-22ca-f896-f51dcedf0b3e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87pmx47cs9.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>

On 02/06/21 17.50, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> So from the outset the code added around 79444c92943 (utf8: handle
> systems that don't write BOM for UTF-16, 2019-02-12) needs to be more
> careful (although this looked broken before), i.e. we should test exact
> known-good bytes and see if UTF-16 is really what we think it is,
> etc. This is likely broken on any big-endian non-GNUish iconv
> implementation.
> 
So we're still fixing for utf-16le case, right?

And what about known-good bytes on utf-16be?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara