From: Kyle Moffett Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:52:29 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl Message-ID: <68B09015-4411-470A-BA88-732969469AA2@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <46C30220.6060007@gmail.com> On Aug 15, 2007, at 09:39:44, Rene Herman wrote: > On 08/15/2007 03:33 PM, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > [ git info --maintainer ] > >> I'd really _love_ a tool that does all that what you've proposed >> above! But why does it have to be "git-info" or anything in the >> git(7) suite for that matter? This sounds like a job for a >> different specialised tool, long with ".metatags" kind of files >> dispersed in the source tree. > > To automatically move (and delete) the meta-data alongside the > files themselves is a reason. > > More generally -- shouldn't it? This is about source management > (well, maybe more about project management, but...) and the source > code management tool looks to be the right place for that. The > different parts of git are somewhat/fairly stand-alone as is, no? If you were going to do that I'd just suggest making git aware of the "user.*" extended attributes and having it save those into the git repo along with the permission data. Cheers, Kyle Moffett