From: Björn Gustavsson Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:05:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fix reword when using a terminal editor Message-ID: <6672d0160910160105t33ea0585r5c791d47d03f40a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1255674753-13949-1-git-send-email-bebarino@gmail.com> 2009/10/16 Stephen Boyd : > We don't want to use output() on git-commit --amend when rewording the > commit message. This leads to confusion as the editor is run in a > subshell with it's output saved away, leaving the user with a seemingly > frozen terminal. > > Fix by removing the output part. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > > On top of next. > > I think this is right, although I'm not really experienced in the rebase -i > code Thanks! Yes, it seems right to me too after a more thorough reading of the existing rebase -i code. It seems that 'output' is only used for non-interactive commands. I never noticed the problem because I use 'emacsclient' as my commit editor. I didn't think of testing with an editor that run in the terminal window. /Björn -- Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB