From: Philip Oakley Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 06:59:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule documentation: Reorder introductory paragraphs Message-ID: <6259B4241C4241D8A9104D3A49C36957@PhilipOakley> In-Reply-To: From: "Stefan Beller" > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Philip Oakley > wrote: >>> +Submodules are not to be confused with remotes, which are meant >>> +mainly for branches of the same project; >> >> >> This use of 'branches' didn't work for me. "remotes are meant mainly >> for >> branches of the same project" ? >> > > Maybe > > Submodules should not be confused with remote repositories, which > are > meant to track the same repository, just at another location; ... > > ? Though I'm not yet completely happy with that either. > I like that better. I was going to check what the git glossary said a remote was, but the commute to work beckons... Philip