From: Mike Dalessio <mike@csa.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:55:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] instaweb: support for Ruby's WEBrick server
Message-ID: <618c07250709170655p649a71fdwcfaaa4d5bfcd06ff@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <823axd32dz.fsf@mid.bfk.de>

I could generate a second /bin/sh script to run
  "ruby .../webrick.rb"
This would assume that 'ruby' was in the user's $PATH, but that seems
like a reasonable expectation.

The drawback is that we'd be generating TWO scripts, one ruby script
to invoke the server, and one shell script to run the ruby
script. This seems a little ... circuitous.

Another idea is to hack the $httpd variable to contain a command
string like "ruby .../webrick.rb", with the drawback then being a lack
of obviousness, since the convention is that the variable contains the
same command as the --httpd argument, and is named the same as
the <webserver>_conf() functions.

On 9/17/07, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> wrote:
> * Thomas Adam:
>
> > This is what /usr/bin/env is useful for, but it's not that portable.
>
> Yeah, it's /bin/env exclusively on some systems. 8-(
>
> --
> Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
> BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
> Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
> D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99
>


-- 
mike dalessio
mike@csa.net