From: Mathias Kunter <mathiaskunter@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:54:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: push: explain default=simple correctly
Message-ID: <5fa7e3f4-60a0-c3b1-83f2-054ed38e5683@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <60b4fd4db5dee_24d282088c@natae.notmuch>

Am 31.05.21 um 17:14 schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> In your above example, I'm in centralized workflow, but I can still push
>> the fix-1 branch to origin without having to configure an upstream
>> branch for it.
> 
> No, you can't:
> 
>    % git push
>    fatal: The current branch fix-1 has no upstream branch.
>    To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use
> 
>        git push --set-upstream origin fix-1
> 
> Isn't that problem the one you originally described [1]?

It is.

> Maybe you are thinking this patch series implements the fix I proposed:
> it doesn't.

Yes, I thought so. Sorry for the confusion. When I asked "will your 
provided patch fix these failing push commands" you answered "It's not 
really a patch (yet), but yeah: it will". So that's why I thought so.

My point simply is: For the sake of easiness of use, I think the 
following should work with the default settings of git:

    git clone $url
    git checkout -b fix-1
    # do commits
    git push           # should push to origin/fix-1
    # others push to origin/fix-1 (but no local changes)
    git pull           # should pull from origin/fix-1

Will this be implemented?