From: Derrick Stolee Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:20:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] log: add %S option (like --source) to log --format Message-ID: <5dfd92d1-2e87-3006-1630-a33794b6066b@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181219083305.2500-1-issac.trotts@gmail.com> On 12/19/2018 3:33 AM, issac.trotts@gmail.com wrote: > From: Issac Trotts > > Make it possible to write for example > > git log --format="%H,%S" > > where the %S at the end is a new placeholder that prints out the ref > (tag/branch) for each commit. > > Using %d might seem like an alternative but it only shows the ref for the last > commit in the branch. > > Signed-off-by: Issac Trotts > > --- > > This change is based on a question from Stack Overflow: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12712775/git-get-source-information-in-format > --- > Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 2 ++ > builtin/log.c | 2 +- > log-tree.c | 1 + > pretty.c | 15 ++++++++++ > pretty.h | 1 + > t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt > index 417b638cd..de6953108 100644 > --- a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt > +++ b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ The placeholders are: > - '%cI': committer date, strict ISO 8601 format > - '%d': ref names, like the --decorate option of linkgit:git-log[1] > - '%D': ref names without the " (", ")" wrapping. > +- '%S': ref name given on the command line by which the commit was reached > + (like `git log --source`), only works with `git log` This "only works with `git log`" made me think about what would happen with `git rev-list --pretty=format:"%h %S"` and the answer (on my machine) was a segfault. > - '%e': encoding > - '%s': subject > - '%f': sanitized subject line, suitable for a filename > diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c > index e8e51068b..be3025657 100644 > --- a/builtin/log.c > +++ b/builtin/log.c > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void cmd_log_init_finish(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, > rev->diffopt.filter || rev->diffopt.flags.follow_renames) > rev->always_show_header = 0; > > - if (source) { > + if (source || (rev->pretty_given && (rev->commit_format == CMIT_FMT_USERFORMAT) && w.source)) { > init_revision_sources(&revision_sources); > rev->sources = &revision_sources; > } Likely, you'll want to duplicate this initialization in the revision machinery. Keep this one in builtin/log.c as it was before, but add something like this initialization to setup_revisions(). Add a test for rev-list. [snip] > @@ -1194,6 +1195,17 @@ static size_t format_commit_one(struct strbuf *sb, /* in UTF-8 */ > load_ref_decorations(NULL, DECORATE_SHORT_REFS); > format_decorations_extended(sb, commit, c->auto_color, "", ", ", ""); > return 1; > + case 'S': /* tag/branch like --source */ > + if (c->pretty_ctx->rev->sources == NULL) { Use "if (!c->pretty_ctx->rev->sources". > + return 0; > + } > + slot = revision_sources_at(c->pretty_ctx->rev->sources, commit); > + if (slot && *slot) { I'm not sure this check for 'slot' being non-null is necessary, as we would already get a failure in the commit-slab code (for revision_sources_at()) if the slab is not initialized. > + strbuf_addstr(sb, *slot); > + return 1; > + } else { > + die(_("failed to get info for %%S")); Here, you die() when you fail to get a slot but above you return 0 when the sources are not initialized. I don't see another use of die() in this method. Is that the right way to handle failure here? (I'm legitimately asking because I have over-used 'die()' in the past and am still unclear on when it is appropriate.) > ' > > +test_expect_success 'set up %S tests' ' > + git checkout --orphan source-a && > + test_commit one && > + test_commit two && > + git checkout -b source-b HEAD^ && > + test_commit three > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'log --format=%S paints branch names' ' > + cat >expect <<-\EOF && > + source-b > + source-a > + source-b > + EOF > + git log --format=%S source-a source-b >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'log --format=%S paints tag names' ' > + git tag -m tagged source-tag && > + cat >expect <<-\EOF && > + source-tag > + source-a > + source-tag > + EOF > + git log --format=%S source-tag source-a >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'log --format=%S paints symmetric ranges' ' > + cat >expect <<-\EOF && > + source-b > + source-a > + EOF > + git log --format=%S source-a...source-b >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > +test_expect_success '%S in git log --format works with other placeholders (part 1)' ' > + git log --format="source-b %h" source-b >expect && > + git log --format="%S %h" source-b >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > +test_expect_success '%S in git log --format works with other placeholders (part 2)' ' > + git log --format="%h source-b" source-b >expect && > + git log --format="%h %S" source-b >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > test_done Please also add a simple test to t6006-rev-list-format.sh. Thanks, -Stolee