From: Flavio Poletti <flavio@polettix.it>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:49:49 GMT
Subject: Re: git-diff/git-format-patch safe for GNU (or POSIX) patch?
Message-ID: <58284.213.203.159.164.1214480989.squirrel@upmail.polettix.it>
In-Reply-To: <20080626103607.GA16525@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

Thanks for the feedback! I wonder if this feature of patch "ignoring"
stuff it doesn't understand is a GNU feature or a POSIX feature, but I'm
abusing your patience here. (Incidentally, I also saw that POSIX has no
"unified" format, but this "ignoring" feature might apply in a wider
sense).

>> 4. some hints to use git for working on projects that do not use any
>> other VCS, or for which one only wants to produce and send a quick
>> patch starting from a tarball.
>
> You can use git/contrib/fast-import/import-tars.perl to import the
> last few releases into git (possibly just the last release, if you
> don't need the history) and then just build on that, and send patches
> back to the project when you're done.
>
> When the project makes another release, use import-tars to import the
> new tarball, and then rebase if you have any patches they haven't
> accepted yet.

Importing wasn't actually an issue, just a matter of init/add/commit. I
was more scared about the patch production process, i.e. producing a patch
that could be perfectly usable by the project's maintainers. But given
what you kindly said, I think I can dismiss this as excess of caution by
me.

Thanks,

   Flavio.