From: René Scharfe Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:30:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nedmalloc: work around overzealous GCC 6 warning Message-ID: <57A5136E.20802@web.de> In-Reply-To: Am 05.08.2016 um 23:57 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> Hi Junio & René, >> >> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> Let's try it this way. How about this as a replacement? >> >> I like it (with the if (s2) test intead of if (s1), of course). But please >> record René as author, maybe mentioning myself with a "Diagnosed-by:" >> line. > > Hmph. I cannot do that unilaterally without waiting for René to > respond, though. In any case, with only header and footer changes, > here is what will appear in 'pu'. It's fine with me, thanks. :) Minor comments below. > Thanks. > > -- >8 -- > From: René Scharfe > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 23:56:54 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] nedmalloc: work around overzealous GCC 6 warning > > With GCC 6, the strdup() function is declared with the "nonnull" > attribute, stating that it is not allowed to pass a NULL value as > parameter. > > In nedmalloc()'s reimplementation of strdup(), Postel's Law is heeded > and NULL parameters are handled gracefully. GCC 6 complains about that > now because it thinks that NULL cannot be passed to strdup() anyway. > > Because the callers in this project of strdup() must be prepared to > call any implementation of strdup() supplied by the platform, so it > is pointless to pretend that it is OK to call it with NULL. > > Remove the conditional based on NULL-ness of the input; this > squelches the warning. My commit message would have been much shorter, probably too short. But perhaps add here: "Check the return value of malloc() instead to make sure we actually got memory to write to." > See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html for details. > > Diagnosed-by: Johannes Schindelin > Signed-off-by: René Scharfe > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano > --- > compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c b/compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c > index 677d1b2..2d4ef59 100644 > --- a/compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c > +++ b/compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c > @@ -955,12 +955,11 @@ void **nedpindependent_comalloc(nedpool *p, size_t elems, size_t *sizes, void ** > */ > char *strdup(const char *s1) > { > - char *s2 = 0; > - if (s1) { > - size_t len = strlen(s1) + 1; > - s2 = malloc(len); > + size_t len = strlen(s1) + 1; > + char *s2 = malloc(len); > + You added this blank line. OK. > + if (s2) > memcpy(s2, s1, len); > - } > return s2; > } > #endif >