From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:42:17 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes Message-ID: <57741bea-f264-45ab-b5fc-52466fdcb03e@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Sun, Sep 27, 2026, at 14:50, Junio C Hamano wrote: > kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes: > >> diff --git a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh >> index ef92704de39..640c5dec52e 100755 >> --- a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh >> +++ b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh >> ... >> +# The '--range-diff-notes' has no effect but is allowed >> +test_expect_success 'format-patch --range-diff-notes=not-a-note (no --range-diff)' ' >> + test_when_finished "rm -f 000?-*" && >> + git format-patch --range-diff-notes=not-a-note --cover-letter \ >> + main..unmodified && >> + test_when_finished "rm -f 000?-*" && >> + test_file_not_empty 0000-cover-letter* && >> + test_grep ! "^Range-diff:" 0000-cover-letter* && >> + test_grep ! "## Notes " 0000-cover-letter* >> +' > > The second test_when_finished is redundant, I suspect. Oh yeah. If there is no Range-diff then there won't be a notes section. I'll fix that in the next version. > > Other than this minor nit, I didn't see anything questionable in > this step. > > Thanks.