From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 13:43:51 GMT
Subject: Re: t6044 broken on pu
Message-ID: <572DF117.8060400@ramsayjones.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <572DEA81.4050605@ramsayjones.plus.com>



On 07/05/16 14:15, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/05/16 13:19, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
>>
>>> The "seq" is not understood by all shells,
>>> using printf fixes this,
>>>
>>> index 20a3ffe..48d964e 100755
>>> --- a/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test_description="merges with unrelated index changes"
>>>  #   Commit E: renames a->subdir/a, adds subdir/e
>>>
>>>  test_expect_success 'setup trivial merges' '
>>> -       seq 1 10 >a &&
>>> +       printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 >a &&
>>
>> $ printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10
>> 1
> 
> yep, I think:
> 
>     printf "%d\n" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >a &&
> 
> would be equivalent.
> 

Having said that, there is also 'test_seq' which you can use
to avoid portability problems (although it uses perl, so could
be viewed as a bit heavyweight):

    test_seq 1 10 >a &&

ATB,
Ramsay Jones