From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 19:30:29 GMT
Subject: Re: /* compiler workaround */ - what was the issue?
Message-ID: <572CF0D5.6010305@xiplink.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq60ur3tlu.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 2016-05-06 02:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I wonder if can we come up with a short and sweet notation to remind
> futhre readers that this "initialization" is not initializing but
> merely squelching warnings from stupid compilers, and agree to use
> it consistently?

Perhaps

	#define COMPILER_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING_INITIALIZER 0

or, for short-and-sweet

	#define CUWI 0

?

:)

		M.