From: Johannes Sixt Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 06:50:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] builtin/verify-tag.c: Ignore SIGPIPE on gpg-interface Message-ID: <5700BD33.6090602@kdbg.org> In-Reply-To: <1459638975-17705-2-git-send-email-santiago@nyu.edu> Am 03.04.2016 um 01:16 schrieb santiago@nyu.edu: > From: Santiago Torres > > The verify_signed_buffer comand might cause a SIGPIPE signal when the > gpg child process terminates early (due to a bad keyid, for example) and > git tries to write to it afterwards. Previously, ignoring SIGPIPE was > done on the builtin/gpg-verify.c command to avoid this issue. However, > any other caller who wanted to use the verify_signed_buffer command > would have to include this signal call. > > Instead, we use sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN) on the > verify_signed_buffer call (pretty much like in sign_buffer()) so > that any caller is not required to perform this task. This will avoid > possible mistakes by further developers using verify_signed_buffer. > > Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres > --- > Notes: > I dropped the multiline comment altogheter. > > builtin/verify-tag.c | 3 --- > gpg-interface.c | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c > index 00663f6..77f070a 100644 > --- a/builtin/verify-tag.c > +++ b/builtin/verify-tag.c > @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > if (verbose) > flags |= GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE; > > - /* sometimes the program was terminated because this signal > - * was received in the process of writing the gpg input: */ > - signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); > while (i < argc) > if (verify_tag(argv[i++], flags)) > had_error = 1; > diff --git a/gpg-interface.c b/gpg-interface.c > index 3dc2fe3..c1f6b2d 100644 > --- a/gpg-interface.c > +++ b/gpg-interface.c > @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ int verify_signed_buffer(const char *payload, size_t payload_size, > if (gpg_output) > gpg.err = -1; > args_gpg[3] = path; > + > + sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); > if (start_command(&gpg)) { > unlink(path); > return error(_("could not run gpg.")); But no sigchain_pop() in the error path that we see here? Perhaps you can even defer the sigchain_push() until after start_command()? > @@ -250,6 +252,7 @@ int verify_signed_buffer(const char *payload, size_t payload_size, > close(gpg.out); > > ret = finish_command(&gpg); > + sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE); > > unlink_or_warn(path); > > -- Hannes