From: Dana How Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:55:39 GMT Subject: Re: GIT vs Other: Need argument Message-ID: <56b7f5510704250155j6870a4dand3726e5444fc5021@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070417104520.GB4946@moonlight.home> On 4/17/07, Tomash Brechko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:02:18 +0100, Pietro Mascagni wrote: > > So, in 15 seconds, how does one argue that GIT is vastly superior to > > other version control software, especially CVS. > ... You can't really > explain why 'git commit; git push' into some central repository is > better than 'cvs commit', and pushing after every commit is what > people will be doing at first ;). Yes, your point here is very real -- this perception that git imposes an "extra step" is one thing I'm trying to avoid right now. I think I've almost succeeded... -- Dana L. How danahow@gmail.com +1 650 804 5991 cell