From: Torsten Bögershausen Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:30:54 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mingw: skip some tests in t9115 due to file name issues Message-ID: <56F18F5E.9090301@web.de> In-Reply-To: <7b4eca83305ec05af6434ff80269ba563f2d581d.1458668543.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> On 2016-03-22 18.43, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > These two tests wanted to write file names which are incompatible with > Windows' file naming rules. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin Is there a chance to squeeze in a precondition for HFS under Mac OS ? > -test_expect_success UTF8 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' ' > +test_expect_success UTF8,!MINGW 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' ' +test_expect_success UTF8,!MINGW,!UTF8_NFD_TO_NFC > LC_ALL=$a_utf8_locale && > export LC_ALL && > neq=$(printf "\201\202") && > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ test_expect_success UTF8 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' ' > ' > > # See the comment on the above test for setting of LC_ALL. > -test_expect_success 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 rename on dcommit' ' > +test_expect_success !MINGW 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 rename on dcommit' ' And the same protection for HFS here. Question: Why do we need a UTF8 protection in #11, but not in #12 ? I just tested t9115 under german cygwin, passes. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/288827