From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:05:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] read-cache: increase write buffer size
Message-ID: <56ED0863.3020709@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <1458350341-12276-1-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com>

On 2016-03-19 02.19, David Turner wrote:
> Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index entails
> many such calls.  A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
> leading to increased performance.
> 
> On my repo, which has an index size of 30m, this saves about 10ms of
> time writing the index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
> ---
>  read-cache.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index d9fb78b..09ebe08 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ int unmerged_index(const struct index_state *istate)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define WRITE_BUFFER_SIZE 8192
> +#define WRITE_BUFFER_SIZE 131072
>  static unsigned char write_buffer[WRITE_BUFFER_SIZE];
>  static unsigned long write_buffer_len;
>  
> 
Do I read that right, it saves 10 milliseconds ?
What happens to small system (like Raspberry PI), when you
want 128K write buffer ?
Could the buffer size be turned into a makefile variable, defaulting to 8192 ?