From: Johannes Sixt Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:05:37 GMT Subject: Re: Odd rebase behavior Message-ID: <56747521.9090701@kdbg.org> In-Reply-To: <20151218180549.GA14056@serenity.lan> Am 18.12.2015 um 19:05 schrieb John Keeping: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:43:16AM -0600, David A. Greene wrote: >> John Keeping writes: >> >>> It seems that the problem is introduces by --preserve-merges (and >>> -Xsubtree causes something interesting to happen as well). I see the >>> following behaviour: >> >> Thanks for narrowing this down! Is it possible this is actually a >> cherry-pick problem since --preserve-merges forces rebase to use >> cherry-pick? > > I'm pretty sure this a result of the code in git-rebase--interactive.sh > just below the comment "Watch for commits that have been dropped by > cherry-pick", which filters out certain commits. However, I'm not at > all familiar with the --preserve-merges code in git-rebase so I could be > completely wrong. > >>> git rebase -Xsubtree=files_subtree --onto files-master master >>> >>> fatal: Could not parse object 'b15c4133fc3146e1330c84159886f0f7a09fbf43^' >>> Unknown exit code (128) from command: git-merge-recursive >>> b15c4133fc3146e1330c84159886f0f7a09fbf43^ -- HEAD >>> b15c4133fc3146e1330c84159886f0f7a09fbf43 >> >> Ah, good! I had seen this behavior as well but couldn't remember what I >> did to trigger it. >> >> I don't think I have the expertise to fix rebase and/or cherry-pick. >> What's the process for adding these tests to the testbase and marking >> them so the appropriate person can fix them? I see a lot of TODO tests. >> Should I mark these similarly and propose a patch to the testbase? > > I think marking them with test_expect_failure (instead of > test_expect_success) is enough. > There are a few known breakages recorded in t3512-cherry-pick-submodule.sh. Perhaps the one observed here is already among them? -- Hannes