From: Michael Haggerty Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:54:31 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 25/25] refs: break out ref conflict checks Message-ID: <563EE397.4080608@alum.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <563ED7A0.7040007@alum.mit.edu> On 11/08/2015 06:03 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > [...] > I can see a few ways that we could make our series even more > straightforward: > > 1. Leave refs.c in its original location (as suggested by Junio). > Optionally, it could be moved at a later date when this area is > quiescent. > [...] I just tried this (it was less work than expected). It doesn't make the merge conflict with lf/ref-is-hidden-namespace go away because the functions in the new refs.c are ordered differently than in the old refs.c. But it does turn it into a simple rerere-able conflict. I'll check how much work it would be to make the order of functions in the new refs.c match that in the old one... Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu