From: Tamas Papp Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:00:40 GMT Subject: Re: git name-rev segfault Message-ID: <560b857a-808e-9ac6-ec3e-6778bb4c03e7@rtfm.co.hu> In-Reply-To: <20190729195001.GE14943@sigill.intra.peff.net> Thanks for letting me know and for the corrections too. Cheers, tamas On 7/29/19 9:50 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:19:47PM +0200, Tamas Papp wrote: > >> Generate 100k file into a repository: >> >> #!/bin/bash >> >> rm -rf .git test.file >> git init >> git config user.email a@b >> git config user.name c >> >> time for i in {1..100000} >> do >>   [ $((i % 2)) -eq 1 ] && echo $i>test.file || echo 0 >test.file >>   git add test.file >> >>   git commit -m "$i committed" >> >> done > I lost patience kicking off two hundred thousand processes. Try this: > > for i in {1..100000} > do > echo "commit HEAD" > echo "committer c $i +0000" > echo "data < echo "$i committed" > echo "EOF" > echo > done | git fast-import > > which runs much faster. This doesn't change any files in each commit, > but I don't think it's necessary for what you're showing (name-rev > wouldn't ever look at the trees). > >> Run git on it: >> >> $ git name-rev a20f6989b75fa63ec6259a988e38714e1f5328a0 > Anybody who runs your script will get a different sha1 because of the > change in timestamps. I guess this is HEAD, though. I also needed to > have an actual tag to find. So: > > git tag old-tag HEAD~99999 > git name-rev HEAD > > segfaults for me. > >> Could you coment on it? > This is a known issue. The algorithm used by name-rev is recursive, and > you can run out of stack space in some deep cases. There's more > discussion this thread: > > https://public-inbox.org/git/6a4cbbee-ffc6-739b-d649-079ba01439ca@grubix.eu/ > > including some patches that document the problem with an expected > failure in our test suite. Nobody has actually rewritten the C code yet, > though. > > -Peff