From: Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:50:20 GMT
Subject: Antw: Re: Enhancement Request: "locale" git option
Message-ID: <5485664C020000A100018371@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAN0XMO+hn0cYrd=gVpUad_mQCvkNwdFzFLn0Vo7045-M_0Gsvw@mail.gmail.com>

>>> Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 20:28 in
Nachricht
<CAN0XMO+hn0cYrd=gVpUad_mQCvkNwdFzFLn0Vo7045-M_0Gsvw@mail.gmail.com>:
> 2014-12-05 16:45 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>:
>>
>> I do not know who was first, and who came later, but
>> 
>
<http://git-scm.com/book/de/v1/Git-Grundlagen-%C3%84nderungen-am-Repository-na

> chverfolgen>
>>
>> uses "versioniert" as "tracked"
>>
>>
>> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 git status
>> gives:
>> nichts zum Commit vorgemerkt, aber es gibt unbeobachtete Dateien (benutzen

> Sie "git add" zum Beobachten)
>>
>>
>> Does it make sense to replace "beobachten" with "versionieren" ?
>>
> 
> I think it makes sense. "versionieren" describes the concept of tracking
> better than "beobachten", IMO. I'll send a patch for that.

Isolated from usage, "versionieren" and "tracking" have no common translation;
what about "verfolgen" (~follow) for "tracking"?

> 
> Thanks