From: Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 17:52:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] hashmap: add enum for hashmap free_entries option
Message-ID: <5391FFC3.5010001@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140605060640.GB23874@sandbox-ub>

Am 05.06.2014 08:06, schrieb Heiko Voigt:
> This allows a reader to immediately know which options can be used and
> what this parameter is about.
> 
[...]
> -void hashmap_free(struct hashmap *map, int free_entries)
> +void hashmap_free(struct hashmap *map, enum hashmap_free_options free_entries)
[...]
>  
> +enum hashmap_free_options {
> +	HASHMAP_NO_FREE_ENTRIES = 0,
> +	HASHMAP_FREE_ENTRIES = 1,
> +};

This was meant as a boolean parameter. Would it make sense to have

enum boolean {
	false,
	true
};

or similar in some central place?

Note that an earlier version took a function pointer, and you could pass stdlib's free() in the common case, or a special free routine for nested entry structures, or NULL to do the cleanup yourself.