From: Michael Haggerty Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:47:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] check_refname_component: Optimize Message-ID: <5389B35C.8060308@alum.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20140530172944.GC25443@sigill.intra.peff.net> On 05/30/2014 07:29 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:47:33AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: >> [...] >> If we want to be robust to future changes to refname rules, we could add >> a header flag like >> >> # pack-refs with: peeled fully-peeled check-level=1.0 > [...] > Yeah, I thought about mentioning something like that. But really, this > just seems like a lot of complexity to solve the problem in a wrong way. Yes, you are right. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/