From: Derrick Stolee Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:00:11 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] fetch: add --negotiation-restrict option Message-ID: <5370b884-30e8-44a9-a52e-4c518556fa24@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 4/15/26 5:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > >> - warning("ignoring --negotiation-tip=%s because it does not match any refs", >> - s); >> + warning(_("ignoring %s=%s because it does not match any refs"), >> + "--negotiation-restrict", s); >> - warning("ignoring --negotiation-tip because the protocol does not support it"); >> + warning(_("ignoring %s because the protocol does not support it"), >> + "--negotiation-restrict"); > > These are nice touches to make sure translators cannot possibly > botch these option names that must be given verbatim. >> @@ -2657,7 +2660,7 @@ int cmd_fetch(int argc, >> } >> >> if (negotiate_only && !negotiation_tip.nr) >> - die(_("--negotiate-only needs one or more --negotiation-tip=*")); >> + die(_("--negotiate-only needs one or more --negotiation-restrict=*")); > > OK. Shouldn't this also do the "%s" thing? I think I had focused on adding "%s" to strings that were not previously translated, but adjusting the string under translation is enough to require retranslation. I should make it easier to translate, too. >> } >> return transport; >> } >> @@ -2567,6 +2568,8 @@ int cmd_fetch(int argc, >> OPT_IPVERSION(&family), >> OPT_STRING_LIST(0, "negotiation-tip", &negotiation_tip, N_("revision"), >> N_("report that we have only objects reachable from this object")), >> + OPT_STRING_LIST(0, "negotiation-restrict", &negotiation_tip, N_("revision"), >> + N_("report that we have only objects reachable from this object")), > > Is OPT_ALIAS() suitable for this? I was not aware of this. Thanks for the pointer! I do plan to make "negotiation-tip" an alias for "negotiation-restrict" based on the new preference for *-restrict as the "real" option now. Is that the right way to do this? Thanks, -Stolee