From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 21:42:35 GMT
Subject: RE: git-remote-hg
Message-ID: <5349b34bb72db_473d1391308ac@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20140120.181832.898588286941108442.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>

Christophe wrote:
> I am using git-remote-hg to access to projects on bitbucket.  I can clone the
> master branch fine and push to it.  I also see hg branches as
> remotes/origin/branches/«branch».  However, if I create a local branch
> "branches/x" and want to push it to remotes/origin/branches/x, it gets pushed
> to the remote master (aka default) branch.

Which version of the script and Git are you using?

If I do `git push origin branches/test` it works fine, I can see the branch in
bitbucket.

> What is the recommended way of working with multiple branches when
> interacting with a remote hg repository?

My recommendation is to avoid them (I don't see the point of them), but they
should work.

-- 
Felipe Contreras