From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:04:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/25] unable_to_lock_die(): rename function from unable_to_lock_index_die()
Message-ID: <53440201.5040107@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20140407184728.GB19342@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On 04/07/2014 08:47 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:33:44AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> 
>> This function is used for other things besides the index, so rename it
>> accordingly.
> 
> Oh, and here it is. I should really have just read ahead before
> responding to patch 1.
> 
> We can either re-order these first two, or just not worry about it.

Thanks for catching this.  Yes, swapping the first two patches solves
the problem and doesn't conflict.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/