From: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 07:32:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] unit-tests: add if_test
Message-ID: <51ec32ed-f2f1-4993-92e5-1acfcdbb7c79@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAO_smVh_2FEbTAqJDMZAKMsfTKrB=NH36G6jNmMTaEOtRaP2Pg@mail.gmail.com>

Am 01.08.24 um 00:04 schrieb Kyle Lippincott:
>
> I'm still not wild about the name, and I'm still not convinced of the
> readability improvements. I still want to read `if_test(...)` as
> having a condition in the parenthesis. Tests "skipping everything"
> seems like an internal implementation detail that there's disagreement
> on whether to expose to the test author/reader or not; maybe we should
> redesign if we don't migrate to clar or some other test framework. Do
> we get significant benefits from a test function continuing to execute
> after the "skip everything" flag has been set?

The idea is that the unit test framework may allow to skip individual
tests in the future; see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/c2de7f4e-e5dc-4324-8238-1d06795a2107@gmail.com/

René