From: Ramsay Jones Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:17:09 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] cygwin: Remove the Win32 l/stat() functions Message-ID: <51CCB9E5.3010907@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130626223552.GA12785@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:45:48PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: [ ... ] > I think Michael's assessment above is missing one thing. It is true that > a false positive is just a performance problem in most cases, as we > unnecessarily reload the file, thinking it has changed. > > However, when we have taken a lock on the file, there is an additional > safety measure: if we find the file is changed, we abort, as that should > never happen (it means somebody else modified the file while we had it > locked). But of course Cygwin's false positive here triggers the safety > valve, and we die without even realizing that nothing changed. Indeed, this is exactly the situation. ATB, Ramsay Jones