From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:28:35 GMT
Subject: Re: EasyGit Integration
Message-ID: <51419b2c0906101528k66d99f7avfbb5adb8972a6fe1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vab4fn7dm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> As long as the "fork" is feature complete and the user does not have to
> resort to git-core, even though it may share the same issue of user base
> division, at least that would _help_ the users who choose the forked one,
> who does not have to know the old-timer lingo and concepts.  It would be a
> much better solution than adding stupid synonyms to the existing system.
>
> But coming up with a consistent and complete fork that does not show
> git-core (not just phrases but also underlying concepts) is a lot of work.
> That is the primary reason why nobody did "gh".

What would you think of adding eg to contrib?