From: TJ <git@iam.tj>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:55:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Introduce new build variables INSTALL_MODE_EXECUTABLE and INSTALL_MODE_DATA.
Message-ID: <510AA1E7.9070704@iam.tj>
In-Reply-To: <7vtxpxic5l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 31/01/13 15:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> TJ <git@iam.tj> writes:
> 
>> +	$(INSTALL) -d -m $(INSTALL_MODE_EXECUTABLE) $(DESTDIR)$(man1dir)
>> +	$(INSTALL) -d -m $(INSTALL_MODE_EXECUTABLE) $(DESTDIR)$(man5dir)
>> +	$(INSTALL) -d -m $(INSTALL_MODE_EXECUTABLE) $(DESTDIR)$(man7dir)
>> +	$(INSTALL) -m $(INSTALL_MODE_DATA) $(DOC_MAN1) $(DESTDIR)$(man1dir)
>> +	$(INSTALL) -m $(INSTALL_MODE_DATA) $(DOC_MAN5) $(DESTDIR)$(man5dir)
>> +	$(INSTALL) -m $(INSTALL_MODE_DATA) $(DOC_MAN7) $(DESTDIR)$(man7dir)
> 
> I'm tempted to suggest
> 
>     INSTALL_DIR = $(INSTALL) -d -m 755
>     INSTALL_DATA = $(INSTALL) -m 644
>     INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -m 755
> 
> The number of lines the patch needs to touch will be the same, but
> the resulting lines will not have many $(INSTALL_MODE_BLAH) shouting
> at us.

I did contemplate that but was concerned it might be seen as interfering unduly with
the tool name/path settings, as opposed to their options.

> Besides, you would want to differentiate the two kinds of 755 anyway
> (I'd prefer INSTALL_PROGRAM to use -m 555 personally, for example).

Yes, I think I lost that one in the mists of sed-land when making the changes :)

I'll revise the patch based on received comments and post the revision tomorrow.