From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:59:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] tests: paint known breakages in yellow
Message-ID: <50D49588.60305@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vd2y32ys0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 12/21/2012 04:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> The only thing the additional knowledge adds seems to be to give
> rationale for the old choice of "bold green"---it was not chosen
> from thin-air but can be viewed as following the automake/autotest
> scheme, and other systems cannot agree on what color to pick for
> this purpose.
> 
> I do not see a need to justify why we chose differently from
> automake/autotest; we could say something like:
> 
>     Yellow seems a more appropriate color than bold green when
>     considering the universal traffic lights coloring scheme, where
>     green conveys the impression that everything's OK, and amber that
>     something's not quite right.  This is in line with what 'prove'
>     uses, but different from 'automake/autotest' do.
> 
> but we are not in the business of choosing which is more correct
> between prove and automake/autotest, and I do not see how it adds
> much value to tell readers that color choices are not universally
> agreed upon across various test software suites---that's kind of
> known, isn't it?
> 
> So...
>
That is fine with me, I just pointed it out because I suspected not
everybody was aware of all these details.  If you decide they don't
matter, it's perfectly OK -- but at least now it's an informed
choice ;-)

Thanks,
  Stefano