From: Johannes Sixt Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:52:25 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitk: handle --full-diff correctly Message-ID: <508E27A9.60105@viscovery.net> In-Reply-To: <1351185801-18543-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Am 10/25/2012 19:23, schrieb Felipe Contreras: > Otherwise the files are missing from the diff, and the list of files. > > We do this by creating a limitdiffs variable specific for the view which > can be turned of by using --full-diff. It would be very helpful if you described the problem. "Try it yourself" is not the answer. In particular, what does "correctly" mean in this context? Isn't the subject more like "gitk: handle --full-diff" in the sense that it wasn't handled at all previously and it did what it happened to do? The patch breaks gitk's builtin "limit to listed paths" option - with the patch, the option is only honored at startup, but not when it is changed during the session when --full-diff is not given. Don't know what should happen if it is given. -- Hannes