From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:21:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rev-list-options: clarify the usage of --reverse
Message-ID: <5006033DE52444EAB624BEA7E5A16746@PhilipOakley>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqoa39kn57.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>
>> micro-nit: 'first' and 'last' can be tricky to distinguish for lists...
>
> Let's do this then.

Looks good to me. Thanks. -- Philip

>
> -- >8 --
> From: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:44:09 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] rev-list-options: clarify the usage of --reverse
>
> Users often wonder if the oldest or the newest n commits are shown
> by `log -n --reverse`.  Clarify that --reverse kicks in only after
> deciding which commits are to be shown to unconfuse them.
>
> Reported-by: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
> Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt 
> b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> index 4f009d4..f8946d4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> @@ -638,8 +638,9 @@ avoid showing the commits from two parallel 
> development track mixed
> together.
>
> --reverse::
> - Output the commits in reverse order.
> - Cannot be combined with `--walk-reflogs`.
> + Output the commits chosen to be shown (see Commit Limiting
> + section above) in reverse order. Cannot be combined with
> + `--walk-reflogs`.
>
> Object Traversal
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -- 
> 2.10.0-561-g98a6b79
>
>