From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:03:18 GMT
Subject: Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30808221203r1630addaodb87c0a8b34f0fd2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080822183129.GR23334@one.firstfloor.org>

On 8/22/08, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:56:39PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> > But I presume that's a reasonable common usage. Would it
>> > make sense to have some standard git sub command that does that?
>> > ("get latest state of remote branch, doing what it takes to get it")
>> > Or is there already one that I missed?
>>
>> Isn't that just
>>
>>     git fetch somewhere branchname
>>     git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD
>>
>> ?
>
> My script right now does.
>
> git fetch origin
> git fetch --tags origin
> git remote update
> git checkout master
> git reset --hard origin/master
>


why the two fetch?
isn't git remote update sufficient?

ciao,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/