From: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:39:35 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2012, #01; Sun, 3)
Message-ID: <4FD4DBD7.5070204@lsrfire.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s2VGLj8kRih-95A0VDq86WKWHF3EhLvz0etyHHtP27qLA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 06.06.2012 20:17, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>> The last remaining sticking point is what to do with the duplicated shell
>>>> function.
>>>
>>> What is the problem with leaving it as it is; having it as a duplicate
>>> function. It's not a *huge* maintenance burden, and it's a big problem
>>> if the functions diverge.

In the last sentence you say that there would be a "big problem".

>> It is not even funny to see these two conflicting claims made in a
>> single sentence.  Given that you are aware that it will cause a huge
>> problem to the end users if they diverge,
>
> What would be that *huge* problem?

Here you ask what's so bad about it.

Perhaps you meant to write "it's NOT a big problem" in the first place?

René