From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 20:45:00 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t5541: test more combinations of --progress Message-ID: <4FA04B4C.4090507@in.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120501084307.GC4998@sigill.intra.peff.net> On 05/01/2012 10:43 AM, Jeff King wrote: > -test_expect_success TTY 'quiet push' ' > +test_expect_success TTY 'push shows progress when stderr is a tty' ' > + cd "$ROOT_PATH"/test_repo_clone && > + test_commit noisy && > + test_terminal git push 2>&1 | tee output && > + grep "^Writing objects" output > +' > + > +test_expect_success TTY 'push --quiet silences status and progress' ' > cd "$ROOT_PATH"/test_repo_clone && > test_commit quiet && > - test_terminal git push --quiet --no-progress 2>&1 | tee output && > + test_terminal git push --quiet 2>&1 | tee output && > test_cmp /dev/null output > ' > > +test_expect_success TTY 'push --no-progress silences progress but not status' ' > + cd "$ROOT_PATH"/test_repo_clone && > + test_commit no-progress && > + test_terminal git push --no-progress 2>&1 | tee output && > + grep "^To http" output && > + ! grep "^Writing objects" ! grep "^Writing objects" output > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'push --progress shows progress to non-tty' ' > + cd "$ROOT_PATH"/test_repo_clone && > + test_commit progress && > + git push --progress 2>&1 | tee output && > + grep "^To http" output && > + grep "^Writing objects" output > +' > + I understand that test_i18ngrep is not necessary, because pack-objects.c is not internationalized. But wouldn't it make sense to use test_i18ngrep in preparation, so that tests don't have to be modified later on? - Zbyszek