From: Ben Tebulin Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:00:40 GMT Subject: Re: Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push? Message-ID: <4F687168.30007@spamgourmet.com> In-Reply-To: > +1 for 'upstream'. "Push" should mirror "pull" by the principle of > least surprise. One more +1 for 'upstream'! After setting up remotes for a branch, 'matching' is convenient, but simply does not match the expectations of a newbie user.