From: Vincent van Ravesteijn Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 11:03:21 GMT Subject: Re: Edit a rerere conflict resolution Message-ID: <4F646F79.9090408@lyx.org> In-Reply-To: <7vobrwh4zc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Op 16-3-2012 17:42, Junio C Hamano schreef: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: >> >>> No, I turned rerere.autoupdate off. Proven in the above by the line >>> "Resolved... " instead of "Staged...". >> Yeah, actually I just tried and the procedure works with or without >> autoupdate for me. >> >> So there is something different between our setup (or the nature of the >> conflict), but I do not know what it is offhand. > The last message from me on this topic for now as I'll be a bit too busy, > but a wild guess/hunch: grep NEEDSWORK near rerere.c::handle_cache()? > > I suspect that we might need to also update this function to handle "both > sides added, but differently" case, as we do so in check_one_conflict() > these days, but for Vincent's particular case that shouldn't be the cause. Yes, the problem is with the renormalization (of eol style) in handle_cache. When I've set 'core.autocrlf = true', 'git rerere forget' fails because it does not renormalize. The sha1 of the merge conflict is computed with 'crlf' line-ending in handle_file, but with 'lf' line-ending in handle_cache. Even if I change the code to do the renormalization, it fails. In 'renormalize_buffer; , the buffer is converted to 'crlf' by 'convert_to_working_tree_internal', but at the end it is converted back to 'lf' by 'convert_to_git' I don't understand the logic of 'convert_to_git' and 'crlf_to_git' well enough to pinpoint what is going wrong exactly. Vincent