From: Neal Kreitzinger <nkreitzinger@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:24:08 GMT
Subject: Re: Stash during incomplete merge
Message-ID: <4F4D5408.3060505@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F4D377B.2000206@gmail.com>

On 2/28/2012 2:22 PM, Neal Kreitzinger wrote:
>
> You may also want to consider the --keep-index option on your "git
> stash save" if your "testing" workflow doesn't involve adds or
> commits before the git stash apply/pop.
>
the very limited case I had in mind (and probably incorrect assumption)
about your "testing" workflow was:

hack merge-conflicts
$ git add conflict-resolution  (conflict-resolution is in worktree and
index)
hack conflict-resolution with extra stuff (original conflict-resolution
is still in index)
uh-oh, i got carried away and started doing extra stuff (evil merge) and
forgot to finish testing just the conflict-resolutions (pure merge-commit)
$ git stash --keep-index (conflict-resolution is still in index and now
back in wokrtree)
finish testing just the conflict-resolutions (merge-commit-to-be)
(conflict resolutions worked (I knew they would))
$ git stash pop (original conflict resolution is still in index, but
extra-stuff is back in worktree)
$ git commit (commit the conflict-resolutions/merge-commit)
$ git add foo
$ git commit (new foo stuff committed after merge commit)

v/r,
neal