From: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:15:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: print progress
Message-ID: <4EB58B64.3070304@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8CEh6x1O0AHpiErZ_+T2hGwjRZofygmsgVX8_WXV7uDTA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/05/2011 02:02 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> 
> "-q" in fetch-options.txt can be converted to "--no-progress or
> --verbose". How about this?
> 
> --progress::
> --no-progress::
> 	Progress status is reported on the standard error stream by
> 	default when it is attached to a terminal, unless
> 	--no-progress or --verbose is specified. --progress forces
> 	progress status even if the standard error stream is not
> 	directed to a terminal.

Looks good.