From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:40:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip archive --remote tests on Windows
Message-ID: <4E392584.6060509@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3hb5yrhfw.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Am 8/3/2011 11:09, schrieb Jakub Narebski:
> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
>> -test_expect_success 'archive --list shows only enabled remote filters' '
>> +test_expect_success NOT_MINGW 'archive --list shows only enabled remote filters' '
> 
> Shouldn't the prerequisite be called FORK rather than NON_MINGW?

Yes, it should. But we already have one instance of NOT_MINGW in
connection with archive --remote in this file before this patch, and with
Erik's efforts, these particular prerequisites should go away anyway RSN.

-- Hannes