From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:20:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: say "Reset to" in reflog entries for 'git branch -f' operations
Message-ID: <4BBF1B80.8050307@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <vpqk4sgltoh.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>

Am 4/9/2010 14:03, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> 
>> But I also have a functional question: Is "start_from" really the ref
>> *to* which the branch is reset? I hope reset does it right.
> 
> I don't know which is which, but if start_from is the destination of
> the ref, then it should be renamed. I don't think we want to have this
> 
> 		snprintf(msg, sizeof msg, "branch: Reset to %s",
>                                                          ^^
>  			 start_name);
>                          ^^^^^
> 
> in the code.

I think the patch is right.

The "start" part refers to where the branch forks off of existing history.

In the case were an existing branch is pointed to a new commit, the "Reset
to" is indeed correct. IIUC, the "start_name" is what was given on the
command line as fork point (or HEAD if not given). For example, after

   git branch -f thebranch master~23

the reflog of 'thebranch' would now read as "Reset to master~23".

-- Hannes