From: A Large Angry SCM Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:58:20 GMT Subject: Re: GSoC draft proposal: Line-level history browser Message-ID: <4BA544FC.7050007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <81b0412b1003201335g7b37c51mfa3e2280210ebb7e@mail.gmail.com> Alex Riesen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:18, Bo Yang wrote: >> >> Its format should be .. or just a . > > You might want to reconsider the line range syntax. Exactly the same syntax > is already used to specify a commit range, so reusing it may lead to confusion. I, actually, think the proposed line range syntax works because it uses the same _range_ notation. The issue is how to differentiate the _line_ range(s) from the _commit_ range(s); and, yes, I would like multiple ranges of each type as well as multiple files.