From: Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:50:25 GMT
Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing
Message-ID: <4B8B9BF1.10408@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <7vr5o6s5xf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

>  - The branch you happen to have checked out was 'next', but the solution
>    is a bugfix, and should go to 'maint'.
> 
> Now, at this point, you want to checkout 'maint' without losing your local
> change.  The paths you touched with your quick fix are often not different
> between the two branches, and "checkout maint" will checkout the branch
> while keeping your local changes intact.

Does the wording in the manual fit to the mentioned software development practice?

"When <paths> are not given, this command switches branches by updating the
index, working tree, and HEAD to reflect the specified branch."

I see a need for further clarifications of the involved details.
- Only the focus will be set on the specified branch.
- Would it be useful if it will become configurable if the corresponding
contents will also be automatically restored by a checkout?

Regards,
Markus