From: Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:55:52 GMT
Subject: Re: Possible bug with git status in 1.7.0
Message-ID: <4B7EFAD8.9040309@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4B7EBF7B.3090703@gmail.com>

Am 19.02.2010 17:42, schrieb Sergio Callegari:
> Yes! My ideal behavior (if I am not asking too much) would be trying to
> keep the status as little wordy as possible (1 line per submodule)
> 
> e.g. something like
> 
> #       modified module (commit id):   mod1
> #       modified module (modified files): mod2
> #    modified module (untracked files): mod3
> #       modified module (modified files, untracked files): mod4
> #    modified module (commit id, modified files, untracked files): mod5

Yup, one line per submodule should be enough. But maybe it's nicer to
have the details /after/ the submodule name:

#	modified:   mod1 (Submodule has new commit(s), modified content, untracked content)

Then it fits more nicely with the output for files, no?

We could drop the "Submodule has " if people see it as a waste of screen
estate. Also i have no strong feelings about "content", i just happen to
think it is more appropriate as submodules can contain not only files but
other submodules too. Opinions?

Will send a patch for discussion as soon as i have something to show ...