From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:53:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] archive: Refuse to write the archive to a terminal.
Message-ID: <4AB1CEDF.7020105@viscovery.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090917014854.GD3274@feather>

Josh Triplett schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:11:26PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> How about '--output -' instead?
> 
> Yeah, that seems significantly better than --force.  Though I don't
> particularly care for the '-' convention to mean 'stdout'; in principle
> that ought to create a file named '-' in the current directory.
> /dev/stdout makes more sense, and doesn't require any work on git's
> part beyond this patch.

Except that /dev/stdout is not portable. You can always say --output ./-
if you want an oddly named file in the current directory.

-- Hannes