From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:15:57 GMT
Subject: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h
Message-ID: <4A8A552D.6020407@viscovery.net>

From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>

This is a minimal fix to compile block-sha1 on Windows. I did not do any
benchmarks whether the implementation of ntohl() is actually faster than
bytewise access and shifts.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
---
 I would appreciate if our Windows experts could tell whether the
 implementation of ntohl/htonl is worth its money or whether we should
 go with the generic byte access plus shifts.

 the function call over
 block-sha1/sha1.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block-sha1/sha1.c b/block-sha1/sha1.c
index a1228cf..67c1ee8 100644
--- a/block-sha1/sha1.c
+++ b/block-sha1/sha1.c
@@ -7,7 +7,11 @@
  */

 #include <string.h>
+#ifndef _WIN32
 #include <arpa/inet.h>
+#else
+#include <winsock2.h>
+#endif

 #include "sha1.h"

-- 
1.6.4.1179.g9a91.dirty