From: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:49:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands"
Message-ID: <4A815AAC.2030601@avtalion.name>
In-Reply-To: <20090811125813.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>

On 08/11/2009 06:58 AM, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
> From: Ori Avtalion<ori@avtalion.name>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:24:21 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands"
>
> Most of the docs and printouts refer to "commands" when discussing what
> the end users call via the "git" top-level program. We should refer them
> as "git programs" when we discuss the fact that the commands are
> implemented as separate programs, but in other contexts, it is better to
> use the term "git commands" consistently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion<ori@avtalion.name>
> Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi<nanako3@lavabit.com>
> ---
>

Thanks Nanako!

I'm fine with the changes.
(it doesn't help much to nitpick on 'git-foo' vs 'git foo' vs 'foo' :)

You might want to consider this patch too:

diff --git a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt 
b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
index 5cc94ec..8f1b99b 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ git-mailsplit(1)

  NAME
  ----
-git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter program
+git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter

  SYNOPSIS
  --------