From: Artur Skawina <art.08.09@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:39:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block-sha1: improved SHA1 hashing
Message-ID: <4A7B4D84.80906@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908061329320.3390@localhost.localdomain>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> with it, so it is faster for me. So your slowdown seems to be yet another 
> P4 thing. Dang crazy micro-architecture.
> 
> Of course, it might be a compiler version difference too. I'm using 
> gcc-4.4.0.

gcc version 4.4.1 20090603 (prerelease)

> Oh, I did make a small change, but I doubt it matters. Instead of doing
> 
> 	TEMP += E + SHA_ROL(A,5) + (fn) + (constant); \
> 	B = SHA_ROR(B, 2); E = TEMP; } while (0)
> 
> I now do
> 
> 	E += TEMP + SHA_ROL(A,5) + (fn) + (constant); \
> 	B = SHA_ROR(B, 2); } while (0)
> 
> which is a bit more logical (the old TEMP usage was just due to a fairly 
> mindless conversion). That _might_ have lower register pressure if the 
> compiler is silly enough to not notice that it can do it. Maybe that 
> matters.

before: linus          0.6622       92.17
after:  linus          0.6631       92.05
after:  linus          0.6601       92.46
after:  linus          0.6624       92.14

IOW, no difference, just noise.