From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:06:01 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] daemon: send stderr of service programs to the syslog Message-ID: <4A369B99.4030504@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <20090615145716.GW16497@spearce.org> Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > They could, if they were broken. :-) > > IIRC only upload-pack produces progress (from pack-objects). > It does so by using a pipe on fd 2, and either copying it down > to the client via side-band, or discarding it. So progress data > shouldn't ever appear on upload-pack's own fd 2, which means you > won't get it in this syslog thing. > > But I have to wonder, why are we doing this? Why can't we teach the > individual server program to record its error to the syslog before > it aborts? Are we looking for SIGSEGV or something? Its only the > daemon program staying around in memory, but that's a lot of little > daemons doing nothing waiting for their children to terminate. > Seems like a waste to me. > Actually, even logging signals would be useful, so I think this makes sense. The daemon process is pretty trivial compared to the rest of the stuff being spawned. -hpa